<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: VizWorld&#8217;s Predictions for 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/</link> <description>Covering everything about Visualization &#38; Computer Graphics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:08:00 -0600</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Randall Hand</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8286</link> <dc:creator>Randall Hand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8286</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8236&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@andrew&lt;/a&gt; Of course, when you&#039;re talking about Computer Hardware, you&#039;ll regret everything &quot;2 years later&quot;.  Such is the nature of the industry right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8236" rel="nofollow">@andrew</a> Of course, when you&#8217;re talking about Computer Hardware, you&#8217;ll regret everything &#8220;2 years later&#8221;.  Such is the nature of the industry right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randall Hand</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8285</link> <dc:creator>Randall Hand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:48:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8285</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8284&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@tchavez&lt;/a&gt;  I never meant to imply otherwise.  However, AMD&#039;s current implementation has issues.  The poor performance on 4XXX series hardware, lack of any suitable way to intercept the IL/ISA at compile-time, and several other minor annoyances that basically boil down to &quot;It&#039;s the First Release&quot;.Later releases will surely improve, but for now NVidia has the advantage of having several version of CUDA &amp; OpenCL out in the wild for user feedback.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8284" rel="nofollow">@tchavez</a> I never meant to imply otherwise.  However, AMD&#8217;s current implementation has issues.  The poor performance on 4XXX series hardware, lack of any suitable way to intercept the IL/ISA at compile-time, and several other minor annoyances that basically boil down to &#8220;It&#8217;s the First Release&#8221;.</p><p>Later releases will surely improve, but for now NVidia has the advantage of having several version of CUDA &#038; OpenCL out in the wild for user feedback.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tchavez</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8284</link> <dc:creator>tchavez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:29:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8284</guid> <description>Actually, OpenCL is supported on both Nivida and AMD hardware. For more information please visit:http://developer.amd.com/gpu/ATIStreamSDK/Pages/default.aspx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, OpenCL is supported on both Nivida and AMD hardware. For more information please visit:</p><p><a href="http://developer.amd.com/gpu/ATIStreamSDK/Pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://developer.amd.com/gpu/ATIStreamSDK/Pages/default.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: andrew</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8236</link> <dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:20:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8236</guid> <description>Quote: (I fail to see how PCI Express 3.0 and an Intel 8-core processor will “Destory” NVidia.) Hmmm... I didn&#039;t say PCI exp 3.0 and Intel 6(8) core CPU will destroy nVidia - all I said was - that $2000-$4000 still raw Teslas that nVidia is so anxious to release right now would be much more suitable for later. And what&#039;s important for now... (dx11 market btw)... this is where they lose big. nVidia&#039;s got potential, but if they continue to screw around, showing middle class users -&quot;Oh, you guys can wait - we have more important things to take care of...&quot;  ATI will crash them on it(oh, sorry, they already did), and then, ATI will go after FERMI-like-Tesla technology and design it for faster PCIe slots and something more advanced than lousy 1066Mhz-1333Mhz integrated mem controller -  obviously FOR LESS! the companies who will pay 2k-4k for these teslas now, will regret 2 years later(maybe less). so simple. LEARN, nVIDIA, LEARN, BABY, LEARN, WHILE I AM STILL ALIVE!!! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: (I fail to see how PCI Express 3.0 and an Intel 8-core processor will “Destory” NVidia.)<br /> Hmmm&#8230; I didn&#8217;t say PCI exp 3.0 and Intel 6(8) core CPU will destroy nVidia &#8211; all I said was &#8211; that $2000-$4000 still raw Teslas that nVidia is so anxious to release right now would be much more suitable for later. And what&#8217;s important for now&#8230; (dx11 market btw)&#8230; this is where they lose big. nVidia&#8217;s got potential, but if they continue to screw around, showing middle class users -&#8221;Oh, you guys can wait &#8211; we have more important things to take care of&#8230;&#8221;  ATI will crash them on it(oh, sorry, they already did), and then, ATI will go after FERMI-like-Tesla technology and design it for faster PCIe slots and something more advanced than lousy 1066Mhz-1333Mhz integrated mem controller &#8211;  obviously FOR LESS! the companies who will pay 2k-4k for these teslas now, will regret 2 years later(maybe less). so simple. LEARN, nVIDIA, LEARN, BABY, LEARN, WHILE I AM STILL ALIVE!!! :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randall Hand</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8176</link> <dc:creator>Randall Hand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:30:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8176</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8173&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@andrew&lt;/a&gt;  I fail to see how PCI Express 3.0 and an Intel 8-core processor will &quot;Destory&quot; NVidia.  If anything, PCI Express 3.0 will make the Tesla &amp; Fermi _more_ attractive, reducing the one thing they really suck at : moving data back and forth to main memory.And an 8-core Intel CPU still pales to a 512-core Fermi on easily paralleled tasks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8173" rel="nofollow">@andrew</a> I fail to see how PCI Express 3.0 and an Intel 8-core processor will &#8220;Destory&#8221; NVidia.  If anything, PCI Express 3.0 will make the Tesla &#038; Fermi _more_ attractive, reducing the one thing they really suck at : moving data back and forth to main memory.</p><p>And an 8-core Intel CPU still pales to a 512-core Fermi on easily paralleled tasks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: andrew</title><link>http://www.vizworld.com/2009/12/vizworlds-predictions-2010/#comment-8173</link> <dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:23:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizworld.com/?p=10680#comment-8173</guid> <description>Bullshit. real 100% bullshit. And note: the writer of this article with his coool prediction abilities and sure super-duper mind flexibilities forgets to mention that when PCI express 3.0 boards will hit the stores in 2011, and Intel will relese a 10Gt/s 6(8) core cpu, with improved mem. controller hopefully. and year later... the entire series of $2000-$4000 nVidia&#039;s tesla won&#039;t be worth a broken nickle. Why? Because ATI won&#039;t be just sitting down not doing much... It was a big mistake to give full time to those teslas, knowing that DX11 is coming out and that new upcoming six-core Intel&#039;s CPU is for 1366 (means old, retarded mem. controller), PCI express 3.0 is not out yet... blah blah blah... Very poor strategy, nVidia.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit. real 100% bullshit. And note: the writer of this article with his coool prediction abilities and sure super-duper mind flexibilities forgets to mention that when PCI express 3.0 boards will hit the stores in 2011, and Intel will relese a 10Gt/s 6(8) core cpu, with improved mem. controller hopefully. and year later&#8230; the entire series of $2000-$4000 nVidia&#8217;s tesla won&#8217;t be worth a broken nickle. Why? Because ATI won&#8217;t be just sitting down not doing much&#8230; It was a big mistake to give full time to those teslas, knowing that DX11 is coming out and that new upcoming six-core Intel&#8217;s CPU is for 1366 (means old, retarded mem. controller), PCI express 3.0 is not out yet&#8230; blah blah blah&#8230; Very poor strategy, nVidia.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 467/468 objects using eaccelerator
Content Delivery Network via static.vizworld.com

Served from: www.vizworld.com @ 2012-02-10 02:23:49 -->
