What led to the Fall of SGI? – Chapter 2

sgi_cube_logoShortly after I published my SGI Special Edition Podcast, I was contacted by a former SGI Engineer (who preferred to remain Anonymous) with several stories to tell of what happened to SGI. It’s an amazing story full of minor hardware glitches that wound up costing millions, bone-headed oversights during acquisitions, and basic mismanagement of a billion dollar company. The story is far too long and involved for a single post, so I’ll be adding it in chapters over the next few days. So come on inside and witness the saga of what really happened to SGI over the years.. The story has never been told, until now. We’ll begin at the Top:

Chapter 1: Management

Chapter 2: The Acquisitions

1. Alias & Wavefront – 1995

alias wavefront mayaIn 1995, SGI acquired Alias Research and Wafefront Technologies and merged them into the famous “Alias|Wavefront”.  For a graphics company strongly linked to high-end rendering solutions like the kind used in Hollywood, this was an obvious marriage of technologies.  SGI provided the hardware resources, and Alias|Wavefront provided the software in Maya.  SGI held onto it for nearly 10 years, until in June2004 they sold Alias to a private equity invetment firm Accel-KKR for the paltry sum of $57.1 Million. [2]

For years Maya has been considered a premiere tool for visualization, and when SGI initially acquired them the software only ran on IRIX.  SGI eventually, under the fine leadership of Rick Buzzello, abandoned IRIX for more mainstream systems like Windows, requiring them to port their prize rendering product to the other platforms. SGI’s failure to keep that close tie between the rendering software and hardware, coupled with the introduction of high-end consumer graphics tools from other sources (ATI and NVidia), made Maya an attractive resource for any company to have.  Accel-KKR didn’t have to wait long or try hard before Autodesk, owners of 3D Studio Max, took Alias|Wavefront off their hands for $182M in cash just 16 months later. [3]

2. Cray – 1996

Widely considered one of the most poorly management acquisitions in SGI’s history, SGI bought Cray Research for $740M in February 1996.  Again, this was a logical acquisition for SGI, as Cray was a widely successful supercomputer company, with several systems deployed around the world.  SGI wanted large supercomputers to supplement their existing rendering systems, and to break into a new profitable market.  However, only 3 months later, they sold the CS6400 product to Sun. [5]

Cray CS6400

Cray CS6400

The CS6400 was a Sparc-based supercomputer from Cray that was meant to replace the Cray S-MP.  SGI didn’t think very highly of the product, and in face when the engineers were asked how much they thought it was worth, the answer was pretty indicative of their feelings: “it didn’t matter what price they got as it wasn’t worth a shit anyway.”  The exact amount of this sale was never disclosed, but our inside source says the number $60M was thrown around alot. When Sun bought the CS6400, they rebadged it as the Sun Ultra Enterprise, and it became the foundation unit of a whole line of (very profitable) servers and workstations for Sun. [6]  Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun, is known to have said that their purchase of the CS6400 was the best investment since Microsoft bought DOS.

But that’s not all that went weird about the Cray Acquisition.  SGI was already beginning to show some red in their balance sheets, Cray’s profits were slim.  SGI made the decision to operate the two companies almost independently, making it easier to cut Cray if the need arose.  Less than 4 years later, they sold the entire company to Tera Computers, giving us the Cray we know today.  [4] But it wasn’t a total loss, as the Cray engineers working at SGI during that 4 years created the trademark of SGI supercomputers:  NUMALink.

Another interesting tidbit about this acquisition from our inside source has to do with some of the SGI perks.  SGI paid very well back in the mid-90’s, as was the custom during the dot-com boom.  When the Cray engineers came over, they all got a very significant pay-raise under the guise of “bringing their pay up to SGI standards”.  This made retention figures high, but vastly increased the operating costs of the Cray-under-SGI company.  Also, SGI (At the time) offered employees a 6 week sabbatical (paid vacation) for every 4 years of service.  During the merger, SGI chose to honor years of service with Cray (nothing special there, many companies do this) but did not place any restrictions on this Sabbatical.  That meant that employees with 20 years at Cray, suddenly found themselves eligible to take 6 months of paid leave (20 /4 = 5 sabbaticals, 6weeks * 5 = 30 weeks).  It’s no surprise that there was little-t0-no opposition to selling the CS6400 at only 3 months in.  Update: Commenters claiming to work for Cray during this period disagree, and claim a single 6-week Sabbatical was offered after 1 year.

3. The Intergraph ZX10

The Intergraph Zx10

The Intergraph Zx10

In September 2000, SGI acquired the ZX10 series of workstations and servers from Intergraph computers.  SGI had long attempted to build a workstation business, and when they abandoned MIPS processors they decided to buy a division for a quicker start.  But the workstations and servers weren’t the only thing they bought, they also got the staff of the Huntville, AL based company that worked on the products. [1]

The Cray scenario played itself out again, as employees were given the months of sabbaticals from the honored years of service.  Intergraph was founded in 1969, so there was plenty of time to go around.  This actually worked out in SGI’s favor, however, as that gave them time to spend just over $1M to build out an office suite to house the employees.  Unfortunately, the product never took off and the employees were laid off less than 2 months after the construction was completed, all with SGI’s attractive severance packages.

There have been other acquisitions along the way, such as Linux Networks in 2008, but none have had the devastating affects on Morale and the bottom line like these three.  Acquisitions don’t make a company tho, for that you have to make product.  But not all product works according to plan, and in SGI’s case exceedingly so..

  • Be sure to come back and see Chapter 3 : Hardware Problems.  You can follow the entire series via the sgi-bts (behind the scenes) Tag.

References

[1] SGI/Intergraph finalize terms of Strategic alliance – Nov 1 2000

[2] Accel-KKR to Acquire Alias from SGI – April 15 2004

[3] Accel-KKR And Ontario Teachers’ to sell Alias for $182M – Nov 6 2005

[4] Tera to acquire Cray vector business form SGI - 02 Mar 2000

[5] SGI sells Cray’s Sparc Superserver business to SUN – 20 May 1995

[6] How the Sun Enterprise 1000 was born

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the author. The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of VizWorld.com.

PG

About the Author: Randall Hand

Randall Hand is a visualization scientist working for a federal research lab, aiding researchers to discover the insights buried within their terabyte datasets generated on some of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. He also runs VizWorld.com .

Graphics, Hardware, Science , ,

1 Tweet

  1. April 27th, 2009 at 14:34 | #1

    How much did SGI pay for Alias Research and Wafefront Technologies, versus what they sold it for?

    How much did SGI sell Cray to Tera for?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Yeraze
    April 27th, 2009 at 14:38 | #2

    @ lifeguard1999

    SGI Sold Cray for something around $175M (Reference), after buying it for $740Million.

    SGI bought Alias & WAvefront for something akin to $500M. (Reference)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Greg Davis
    April 28th, 2009 at 07:08 | #3

    You are wrong about the sabbatical time off for Cray people. Cray people got one 6 week sabbatical one year after SGI acquired Cray. I was one of those people.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Yeraze
    April 28th, 2009 at 08:17 | #4

    @Greg Davis Thanks for the data point. I’ve integrated it into the article.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. ms
    April 30th, 2009 at 10:15 | #5

    @ Yeraze

    I think SGI sold Cray for something like $100million or $105 million to Tera, which changed its name to Cray

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. ms
    April 30th, 2009 at 10:21 | #6

    I agree with Greg’s comments on Sabatical. Cray employee’s got 6 weeks after the cray purchase.

    They didn’t all get to take it imediately though. It was based on seniority of number of years service. those with the most years got to go first and the others got scheduled afterwards so that everyone wouldn’t take it off “the first summer”.

    As for the Intergraph Purcahse, they paid $100 million to purchase a division of Intergraph that was going to be shut down. SGI paid Intergraph rent for several months to house the employees in Intergraph buildings until the refurbished space could be finished.

    They had been in that new space 2-3 months when they laid all but about 5-10 of them off in a big group meeting.

    The Intergraph employees weren’t terribly upset as they got HUGE severance packages based on years of service that included Intergraph years. Some got 6 months pay.

    this is on top of the 6 months pay they got working for SGI before the layoff and the paid sabaticals they got.

    SGI lost MILLIONS over this.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. RabbJohnny
    April 30th, 2009 at 11:45 | #7

    I was told the Tera deal actually came out to ~$65M. Many months after the deal closed, Tera had not paid…no idea if the $ was ever collected.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Biff
    July 9th, 2009 at 17:40 | #8

    The CS6400 didn’t merely become the basis for a line of profitable Sun servers — the resulting Enterprise 10000 line did more than a billion dollars of business in its first year with Sun, and it kicked more than a few SGI Challenges and Origins out of the data center.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. 3dMan
    August 26th, 2009 at 16:51 | #9

    Your timeline is somewhat wrong. In 1995, there was no Maya, yet – it was first released in 1998. What sold the Irix Boxes were Alias Power Animator and Wavefront’s Adv. Visualizer, of which Maya was a merged Product.
    One other reason for the downfall of SGi was simply, that toward the end of the nineties, you could purchase an NT BOX with a Petium and a descent Graphics card that could at least speedwise, outran any SGI BOX at a much cheaper price.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  1. April 29th, 2009 at 08:15 | #1
  2. June 10th, 2009 at 14:01 | #2
Please consider using one of our verified authentication methods from the left when submitting comments.
* = Required item

Additional comments powered by BackType

VizWorld.com is a production of VizWorld, LLC © 2009